<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Schmap Guides Short-List, Schmort-List</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thoughtbubbles.org/miscellaneous/schmap_guides_shortlist/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thoughtbubbles.org/miscellaneous/schmap_guides_shortlist/</link>
	<description>A grad student blog</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 02:55:34 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: toby schober</title>
		<link>http://www.thoughtbubbles.org/miscellaneous/schmap_guides_shortlist/#comment-4902</link>
		<dc:creator>toby schober</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 10:09:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thoughtbubbles.org/uncategorized/schmap_guides_shortlist/#comment-4902</guid>
		<description>Yes Schmap's is clearly in the business of making money.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes Schmap&#8217;s is clearly in the business of making money.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keith Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.thoughtbubbles.org/miscellaneous/schmap_guides_shortlist/#comment-4900</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 13:40:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thoughtbubbles.org/uncategorized/schmap_guides_shortlist/#comment-4900</guid>
		<description>Great entry.  This is the second time I've been asked by a third-party to use one of my photos that they found on flickr.  I found your entry while doing some research before deciding on an answer.  Your entry confirmed my initial gut-reaction and I'll be answering "No".

BTW, the first time was for a SF based ad agency working for Daimler-Chrylser.  I ultimately said "Yes" after exchanging emails with them.  They (the ad agency) did not pay for the photo (even though they were clearly paid shitloads from Chrysler).  However, they used 3 photos, thumbnail/postage-stamp sized in a full-page JEEP ad that ran in the WSJ, USA Today, and LA Times.  The final size of the images (super-small) was the deciding factor in agreeing.  It was basically a collage with no particular image (of the 700 or so) being featured.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great entry.  This is the second time I&#8217;ve been asked by a third-party to use one of my photos that they found on flickr.  I found your entry while doing some research before deciding on an answer.  Your entry confirmed my initial gut-reaction and I&#8217;ll be answering &#8220;No&#8221;.</p>
<p>BTW, the first time was for a SF based ad agency working for Daimler-Chrylser.  I ultimately said &#8220;Yes&#8221; after exchanging emails with them.  They (the ad agency) did not pay for the photo (even though they were clearly paid shitloads from Chrysler).  However, they used 3 photos, thumbnail/postage-stamp sized in a full-page JEEP ad that ran in the WSJ, USA Today, and LA Times.  The final size of the images (super-small) was the deciding factor in agreeing.  It was basically a collage with no particular image (of the 700 or so) being featured.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
